ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026
Safety and Benefits of Moderate to High Intensity Aerobic Exercise During the Subacute Phase of Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimal exercise prescription for balance after stroke: a Bayesian dose-response network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Robot-assisted gait training in people with subacute and chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of moderate to high intensity exercise for patients in the subacute phase of stroke recovery. Data Sources: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and previous meta-analyses published between January 1994 and October 2024. Study Selection: Title and abstract screening required consensus by 2 reviewers. A total of 27 randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria. Studies were included if they enrolled participants <6 months post stroke. Interventions were eligible if they were of moderate or high cardiovascular intensity as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine. Acceptable comparator groups included sham, low intensity interventions, no exercise, relaxation, or cognitive interventions. Data Extraction: Three reviewers independently extracted data using the COVIDENCE platform, with each article reviewed by at least 2 individuals. Random effect meta-analyses were employed to generate pooled estimates of effects. Primary outcomes included severe cardiac and cerebral adverse events, measures of endurance, and gait speed. Secondary outcomes included death, blood pressure, balance, quality of life, and functional independence. Data Synthesis: Several measures of endurance and gait speed were significantly improved with moderate to high intensity interventions (change in 6-minute walk test, mean difference (MD): 33.11 m; 95% CI, 23.24-42.98; Conclusions: Moderate to high intensity exercise should be considered within acute rehabilitation facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and outpatient settings for patients in the subacute phase of post stroke rehabilitation and screened as appropriate. Physician collaboration for patient selection and continued active monitoring for SAEs is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.