ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026
Bridging HIV prevention and sexual reproductive health services in the context of multi-method PrEP: a qualitative study exploring provider perceptions in South Africa.
Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The introduction of new pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) methods presents an opportunity to expand choice and better integrate HIV prevention and broader sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. Integrating HIV prevention services, including PrEP, and SRH services presents an opportunity to improve healthcare access and outcomes. However, implementation within real-world healthcare settings requires an understanding of both enablers and barriers from the perspective of healthcare providers (HCPs). Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using in-depth interviews (IDIs) to describe the integration of PrEP and SRH services, drawing on the perspectives of HCPs. Thirty-four HCPs were purposively sampled and interviewed between October and November 2024 across four South African locations: eThekwini, Gqeberha, Mthatha, and Tshwane. Audio recordings were transcribed, translated, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis with NVIVO 14 software. Results: Key benefits of service integration expressed by HCPs included increased continuity of care with the same HCP, convenience, and a higher uptake of SRH services, such as contraception and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and management. Facilitators included integrated education and awareness, flexibility in alignment of appointment schedules, and positive staff attitude. Challenges and barriers included misalignment between injectable PrEP and injectable contraceptive visit schedules and infrastructural limitations within some public health facilities. Conclusions: Successful integration requires adaptable systems, responsive scheduling, functional infrastructure, and positive staff attitude. To improve uptake and continuity of SRH services, health systems should be flexible and provide holistic services that align with client needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.