ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2026
From nighttime light exposure to menstrual health: a critical review of evidence, mechanisms, and nursing interventions.
Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid progression of urbanization and the widespread adoption of nocturnal work and lifestyle patterns, artificial light at night (ALAN) has emerged as a significant environmental factor impacting women's health. Current research suggests that exposure to artificial light disrupts human circadian rhythms, potentially leading to irregular menstrual cycles, extended cycle durations, and altered hormone levels in women, thereby elevating reproductive health risks. This paper reviews epidemiological evidence concerning the impact of ALAN on menstrual cycles, critically evaluating the strength and limitations of evidence derived from different study designs. It further analyzes the mechanisms through which key parameters-including light intensity, spectral composition, and duration of exposure- influence circadian rhythms and endocrine systems, while explicitly noting that these mechanisms are largely derived from animal models and must be extrapolated to humans with caution. Furthermore, by integrating recent findings from nursing research, we propose evidence-based, tiered intervention strategies, encompassing health education, personalized lighting management, and lifestyle modifications, to mitigate potential disruptions caused by ALAN. The review aims to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for clinical nursing practices and public health policy formulation, and to highlight priority directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.