ArticleAcute and critical care2026
Real-world experience using multiplex polymerase chain reaction in intensive care unit patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia in South Korea.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are common among critically ill patients, leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates. Conventional culture-based diagnostics require 48-72 hours, which delays pathogen identification and prolongs the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) enables the rapid detection of pathogens and resistance genes, but its effects on real-world antibiotic decision-making remain unclear.
methodsThis retrospective study included patients in the intensive care unit who were diagnosed with HAP or VAP at a tertiary medical center between July 2023 and June 2024. All patients underwent both mPCR and respiratory culture. The primary outcome was the time to the first antibiotic modification based on mPCR or respiratory culture. The secondary outcome was the rate of antibiotic de-escalation from carbapenem or teicoplanin/vancomycin based on mPCR findings.
resultsIn total, 75 patients were included (median age, 68 years; 61.3% male). mPCR identified bacterial pathogens in 45.3% cases, with a median turnaround time of 281 minutes. The median time to antibiotic modification was 5.8 hours for mPCR versus 122.32 hours for culture (P<0.01). Despite negative mPCR results for gram-negative bacilli, carbapenem therapy was discontinued in only 1 of 24 cases (4.2%). Among 39 patients with negative results for Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin or teicoplanin was discontinued in only 3 cases (7.7%).
conclusionsmPCR provided faster pathogen identification and earlier antibiotic modifications than conventional respiratory culture. However, antibiotic discontinuation remained uncommon despite negative mPCR results, highlighting challenges in real-world antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.