SynthesisJournal of surgical oncology2026
Survival Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSurgery is the mainstay of treatment for localized colorectal cancer (CRC); however, little is known about survival outcomes following CRC surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Here, we examine the available data on long-term outcomes following CRC resections in LMICs.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on primary research studies reporting survival data after CRC resection with curative intent in LMICs. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) data were extracted, and random effects modelling was used to estimate the pooled survival rates.
resultsOne hundred and fifty-four studies representing 20,589 CRC patients were analyzed. Notably, only 27 (20%) of the 137 LMICs were represented in the literature. The pooled 5-year OS estimate was 88% (95% CI: 77-95), 76% (69-81), and 57% (49-64) for Stages I, II, and III, respectively. 5-year DFS estimates were 82% (71-90), 76% (67-84), and 59% (51-65) for stages I, II, and III, respectively. Combined OS and DFS estimates for all three stages were 76% and 69%, respectively. Survival rates varied considerably across the included studies and between income groups.
conclusionsWith the rising incidence of CRC globally, our work highlights the dearth of data on long-term outcomes following CRC operations in most LMICs and emphasizes the urgent need for research capacity building.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.