ReviewNursing open2026
The Risk Assessment Tools for Intraoperative Hypothermia in Adults: A Scope Review.
Review in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk prediction models for inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Current Evidence on the Relationship Between Perioperative Hypothermia and Surgical Site Infection: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo review the global scope of inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia risk assessment tools and to provide a reference for standardising risk assessment.
designA scoping review.
methodsStudies on inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia risk assessment tools were systematically searched in Chinese and English databases and guideline websites from their inception up to December 31, 2022.
resultsA total of 20 studies were included based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia risk assessment tools were categorised into risk prediction models (n = 15), risk assessment tables (n = 4), and risk assessment systems (n = 1). Patient factors were reported in 20 articles, surgical factors were reported in 18 articles, anaesthetic factors were used for evaluation in 16 articles, and environmental factors were reported in 12 articles. Assessment components that were reported more than 10 times included age, body mass index, baseline body temperature, intraoperative fluid volume, surgical duration, anaesthesia duration, and room temperature. IMPACT: Patient and surgical factors are important components of inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia risk assessment tools. Several such tools have been developed, but their reliability and validity need evaluation through multi-center and large-scale clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.