ArticleDrug testing and analysis2026
Evaluation of Different Detection and Identification Methods of Intact Tetrahydro-Methyltestosterone Sulfate Metabolites in Doping Control.
Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tetrahydro sulfate metabolites are well-established long-term biomarkers of methyltestosterone use that can be detected intact by LC-MS/MS. However, their identification using product ion spectra under collision-induced dissociation conditions in negative ion mode is an analytical challenge under the provisions of the WADA TD2023IDCR. In this study, six out of eight potential tetrahydro-methyltestosterone sulfate metabolites were microscale-synthesized to facilitate both the structural elucidation of the detected metabolites and the development of direct identification methods. Their identification was based on their GC-MS/(MS) analysis after TMS derivatization or LC-HRMS/(MS) analysis following derivatization of the free 17β-hydroxy group with carbonyldiimidazole (CDI), producing 17β-OH-imidazole carbamate derivatives. The resulting derivatives were detectable in both negative and positive ion modes, enabling their identification through characteristic product ion spectra. Urine samples from two 17α-methyltestosterone excretion studies were analyzed using these methods, and detection/identification time windows of intact sulfate metabolites were estimated under TD2023IDCR and compared with those obtained from GC-MS/(MS) analysis of the glucuronide fraction after hydrolysis. Overall, the inclusion of the tetrahydro-methyltestosterone sulfate metabolites significantly extends the detection time window for methyltestosterone abuse. Still, the established identification time window was similar to, or shorter than, that derived from the glucuronide fraction analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.