ArticleJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2026
ParaHox Genes Revisited: From Gut Patterning to Integrated Axial and Neural Organization in Rotifera.
Article in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ParaHox homeobox genes Gsx, Xlox, and Cdx are evolutionarily related to Hox genes and form part of the ANTP-class homeobox gene repertoire. Comparative genomic data indicate that ParaHox genes were already present before the cnidarian-bilaterian split. Across metazoans, ParaHox genes often show conserved associations with the anteroposterior body axis and have been implicated in both gut patterning and neural development, although gene complements and genomic organization vary substantially among lineages. To investigate ParaHox gene deployment in Gnathifera, we identified orthologs of Gsx and Cdx across gnathiferan lineages, including Chaetognatha, Monogononta, Bdelloidea, Seisonidea, and Acanthocephala, but found no evidence of Xlox, indicating a reduced ParaHox gene complement. We analyzed the genomic organization and embryonic expression of Gsx and Cdx in the monogonont rotifer Brachionus manjavacas (Bm). Genomic mapping revealed a dispersed ParaHox configuration, with Bm-Gsx and Bm-Cdx separated by 4.4 Mb. Using whole-mount in situ hybridization, we detected Bm-Gsx expression in neurons of the foot region, as well as in a small number of cells with neuronal characteristics and probable involvement in stomatogastric system development. Bm-Cdx was expressed in FMRFamide-positive cells associated with the bladder, consistent with a neuroepithelial identity. Together, these data indicate that in rotifers, ParaHox gene expression is predominantly associated with neural structures. We propose that this pattern represents a derived condition reflecting the compact body plan and reduced gut organization characteristic of rotifers, highlighting the evolutionary flexibility of ParaHox gene deployment under lineage-specific developmental constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.