ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2026
Latent profile analysis of resilience among people with serious mental illness.
Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesResilience is a critical indicator of the personal recovery process for people with serious mental illness (SMI). However, little is known about resilience subtypes among this population. Grounded in Kumpfer's resilience model (KRM), the study aims to identify latent types of resilience among people with SMI using latent profile analysis (LPA).
designA cross-sectional survey design was used.
methodsA total of 297 individuals with self-reported SMI completed an online survey, including demographic variables and measures that resemble core components of the KRM.
resultsThe LPA identified three resilience profiles: Maladaptive, Homeostatic and Resilient. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) revealed distinct patterns of the three resilience profiles on all factors in the KRM and the outcome variable-adaptation to psychiatric disability. ANOVA and Chi-square tests indicated several demographic variables predict profile membership, including age, marital status, highest educational attainment, employment status, average weekly work hours and primary SMI diagnosis. However, sex, race-ethnicity, annual income and years since SMI diagnosis do not predict profile membership.
conclusionsThe study contributes to the understanding of resilience subtypes and associated protective and risk factors for resilience among people with SMI, suggesting early, tailored strength-based interventions to promote resilience and personal recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.