ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026
Multistep inference across the human lifespan can be improved with individualized memory interventions.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sparsity and memory constraints interact with training sequence to bias learning of associative maps.Neuropsychologia · 2026Article
- General knowledge and detailed memory benefit from different training sequences.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEffective goal-directed decision making relies on memory and planning-processes that are known to decline with age. We tested the hypothesis that these declines stem from a common mechanism by focusing on mnemonic discrimination, a measure of memory precision that shows unique vulnerability to age-related decline.
methodsWe used a latent learning task that measures the ability to learn and make judgments about associations among interconnected stimuli, assessing performance across the adult life span. This task allows us to measure multistep inference judgments that reflect how individuals organize relational structure, previously shown to capture the internal model-construction processes that support model-based planning. In Experiment 1, we examined relationships between judgment performance and memory precision. In Experiment 2, we tested whether a "blocked" learning schedule designed to reduce memory interference by separating overlapping objects could improve performance for individuals with weaker memory abilities.
resultsAcross the life span, both younger and older adults showed evidence of successful latent learning and inference, but variability in judgment performance was explained by mnemonic discrimination ability. In Experiment 2, mnemonic discrimination interacted with training condition: intermixed training benefited those with high memory precision, whereas blocked training benefited those with low memory precision. We also implemented artificial neural network simulations, which reproduced these qualitative patterns. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that age-related declines in complex judgments stem from declines in mnemonic discrimination and demonstrate that individualized, memory-based training interventions can improve learning and reasoning processes that support goal-directed planning, offering a promising approach to preserving decision-making abilities across the life span.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.