ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026
Countdown to lobectomy: interventions to improve waiting times for lung cancer resection.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrompt diagnosis and treatment are critical to improving outcomes in patients with lung cancer. In Northern Ireland, cancer waiting times are among the worst in the UK. Since 2022, national targets have mandated that definitive treatment should commence within 62 days of referral and within 31 days of the decision to treat (DTT). The present study aimed to evaluate adherence to these standards and to assess the impact of targeted, cost-neutral interventions on waiting times.
methodsWe conducted a three-cycle, prospective quality improvement study of patients undergoing lung lobectomy for primary lung cancer at a regional thoracic centre (N = 86). Interventions included the implementation of a joint thoracic surgery-oncology clinic and a patient pooling initiative (cycles 1-2), followed by broader service reorganization (cycles 2-3). Primary outcomes were waiting times relative to the 62- and 31-day targets; secondary outcomes were waiting times for preoperative investigations. A post-Lasso regression was performed to identify which intervals contributed most to overall (62-day) delay.
resultsFollowing the introduction of joint clinics and patient pooling, the mean time from referral to lobectomy decreased by 27% (from 150.47 to 109.67 days; P = .005, dR = 0.55). No further improvement was observed following service reorganization. There was no change in time from DTT to surgery (all P > .05). Overall, only 5.8% and 16.3% of patients met the 62- and 31-day targets, respectively. Post-Lasso regression identified time to PET and biopsy, as well as delays between DTT, outpatient review, and lobectomy, as significant contributors to overall wait.
conclusionsJoint clinics and patient pooling initiatives were associated with significant reductions in surgical waiting times; however, compliance with national targets remained poor. While the interventions trialled were ostensibly cost-neutral, further improvement is unlikely without substantive investment in diagnostic infrastructure and operative capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.