ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
Exploring social support for eating disorders in Indigenous contexts.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Invisible: Confronting the Policy and Practice Void in Eating Disorder Prevention and Treatment for Indigenous Peoples in Canada.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Understanding experiences of psychedelic treatments for eating disorders: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders can affect anyone, regardless of cultural and ethnic background. However, culturally situated understandings of eating disorders are important for optimizing care. Moreover, social support is widely recognized as a key component in the recovery of eating disorders. Established Euro-Western treatment models generally conceptualize social support as the role family and close friends play in providing emotional and practical support during a loved one's recovery. Indigenous perspectives of social support, which may include connection to ancestors, community, non-human relatives, and the land, are largely absent from such models, which limits understanding of the culturally relevant social networks that can help support Indigenous peoples with eating disorders. The present research addresses this gap exploring social support through Indigenous worldviews.
methodsThis qualitative project was completed with an Indigenous research approach. Two Indigenous therapists participated in a semi-structured sharing circle (focus group) and one Indigenous therapist participated in a semi-structured individual conversation (interview). Both the sharing circle and the interview were facilitated by the lead author, who is an Indigenous researcher. The data were analysed using qualitative description.
resultsQualitative analysis produced two main themes that reflect interrelated conceptualizations of social support from Indigenous perspectives, relevant to working with Indigenous peoples struggling with eating disorders. The interrelated themes were Wahkotowin (relationships between all things), and 2) land as support and (re)connection.
conclusionsThis research presents novel insights into Indigenous perspectives on social support as relevant to eating disorder treatment. It expands the understanding of social support beyond immediate family networks to include relationships between all things, including ancestors, community, all living things, and the importance of land-based healing. The study addresses the need for Indigenous perspectives in the field of eating disorders research and treatment as well as the need to understand and incorporate culturally specific forms of social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.