ArticleBMC research notes2026
Implementation and acceptability of a community based intervention for cervical cancer screening amongst women of reproductive age in Kiambu County, Kenya.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-based interventions for non-communicable diseases in Africa: a scoping review of scope, effectiveness, and implementation factors.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn Kenya, cervical cancer is the top cause of cancer deaths and second most prevalent cancer among women aged 15–44. Despite the existence of screening programs, only 13.8% of women participate, with nearly 50% diagnosed late. Lack of knowledge and embarrassment is linked to low uptake. Post-intervention, uptake of screening and acceptability of SMS prompts and self-sampling were evaluated.
methodsWomen (18+ years), who had never screened, were randomly chosen from a pre-existing database. They received either usual care (notification of availability of screening services at public health facility), text education, or interactive in-person sessions with self-sample training.
results85 women received health education and self-sample kits, 55 received SMS prompts, and 36 received usual care. Screening rates were highest in the self-sample group (53%). 78% of self-sample participants recommended the Evalyn brush. Only about 52% of SMS recipients found the messages useful, and just 31% were open to receiving more educational messages. Community health workers were instrumental in the implementation of self-sample collection.
conclusionsCommunity-based strategies leveraging existing resources and incorporating education and self-sampling demonstrate feasibility and potential acceptability, particularly in culturally rooted areas with geographical access barriers. Careful design of messaging strategies for behavior change remains crucial. Trial registration The trial was approved for registration with the Pan African Clinical TrialRegistry on 21/09/2023 (Clinical Trial No. PACTR202309878831811). https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=25484 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.