ArticleScientific reports2026
Modulation of feedback-related negativity by objective and subjective response correctness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring actions and outcomes is essential for flexible adaptation to environmental demands. Information about errors is important regardless of whether it is internally generated or externally signaled. Following incorrect responses, an event-related potential (ERP) component known as error-related negativity (ERN) appears in electroencephalographic (EEG) signals and reflects activity of the performance monitoring system located in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC). Another ERP component associated with performance monitoring, feedback-related negativity (FRN), has been shown to process feedback stimuli related to performance errors. However, unlike the ERN, which is elicited by errors that may not reach conscious awareness, it remains unclear whether the FRN is modulated by unconsciously perceived errors. To examine modulation of the FRN by objective and subjective response correctness, EEG was recorded from 28 participants performing a digit-entering task that included trials with false feedback. Single-trial EEG analysis using linear mixed-effects models revealed that FRN amplitudes were modulated by objective response correctness after controlling for subjective reports of error certainty. Response time in the subsequent trial was also influenced by objective correctness, although no behavioral measure fully aligned with ERN or FRN patterns. These findings suggest a common representation of objective correctness in response- and feedback-related pMFC activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.