Impact of different stocking densities on growth performance, welfare and physiology of Litopenaeus vannamei in RAS.

Paolo Gamberoni, Mirko Bögner, Eva Kreuz, Matthew James Slater, David Bierbach, Sven Wuertz

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paolo GamberoniAlfred-Wegener-Institute Helmholtz-Centre for Polar-and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany. paolo.gamberoni@awi.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-9716

Mirko BögnerAlfred-Wegener-Institute Helmholtz-Centre for Polar-and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-7348

Eva KreuzDepartment Fish Biology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9281-826X

Matthew James SlaterAlfred-Wegener-Institute Helmholtz-Centre for Polar-and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-544X

David BierbachFaculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt University, Invalidenstr. 42, 10099, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7049-2299

Sven WuertzDepartment Fish Biology, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8190-2684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal stocking density allows shrimp farmers to maximise profit while maintaining animal welfare. To date, holistic assessments of chronic crowding stress effect on Litopenaeus vannamei are lacking regarding biological impairments, stress-related behaviors, and recovery capacity. Twelve tanks of a recirculation aquaculture systems were maintained at three stocking densities: 1 kg/m

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAquaculturePenaeidaeAnimalsCrowdingHemolymphOxidative StressPopulation DensityStress, PhysiologicalChronic stressShrimp aquacultureShrimp behaviorShrimp healthShrimp physiologyStocking density

Identifiers

PMID41833993

DOI10.1038/s41598-026-42332-2

PMCPMC12992658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.