ArticleScientific reports2026
Transformer-based prediction of radiotherapy couch shift risk in prostate cancer based on rectal volume.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate tumor targeting is vital in prostate cancer (PCa) radiotherapy for precise dose delivery and minimizing healthy tissue exposure. Currently, no artificial intelligence (AI) tool exists to predict setup degradation risk considering rectal volume (RV) changes pre-treatment. Our study aimed to assess this risk and identify a critical RV cutoff. We retrospectively analyzed 498 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 38 PCa patients. Rectal organs at risk were contoured, and 3D couch shifts were calculated. A novel unsupervised 2-stage transformer-based encoder processed longitudinal RV and displacement data. K-means clustering grouped patients, visualized with T-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE). Statistical analysis, including ROC AUC, identified an optimal planning CT RV cutoff. Three distinct patient clusters were observed in CBCT scans. A significant correlation (p < 0.001) was found between initial RVs and these clusters. The ROC AUC was 0.93, establishing an optimal cutoff of 81.62 cm³ for planning CT RV, effectively distinguishing patients prone to significant positional variability. Our study developed an AI-driven model predicting patient couch shifts in PCa radiotherapy, identifying a crucial RV threshold. These findings may advance positioning accuracy, enabling proactive adjustments and optimizing therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.