ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative plastid genomics of Hippophae reveals phylogenetic relationships and provides candidate DNA markers for taxonomic identification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sea buckthorn (Hippophae L., Elaeagnaceae) is of considerable ecological and economic importance, and primarily distributed across the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and adjacent regions. Morphological similarity among taxa has long hindered accurate species and subspecies identification, underscoring the need for robust molecular diagnostics. This study analyzed the complete plastid genome sequences of five Hippophae species (17 accessions), including a newly assembled genome of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. mongolica. The genomes (~ 155–156 kb) exhibited a conserved quadripartite structure comprising 85 protein-coding, eight rRNA, and 38 tRNA genes. Phylogenomic reconstruction based on 78 protein-coding genes well-resolved the interspecific relationships, confirmed the monophyly of Hippophae and H. rhamnoides, and consistently placed H. tibetana within the H. rhamnoides clade. Comparative analyses identified 46 highly variable regions and abundant A/T-rich simple sequence repeats, predominantly in intergenic spacers. Inverted repeat boundaries were largely conserved across taxa, with H. salicifolia exhibiting a distinctive ndhF–IRb/SSC configuration. These plastid genomic resources provide a robust foundation for the development of diagnostic molecular markers with direct applications in Hippophae taxonomy, phylogenetics, germplasm conservation, and targeted breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.