Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41833887›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2026

Biological validity, test-retest reliability, and behavioral relevance of the single-subject brain volumetric similarity network.

Minchul Kim, Yae Ji Kim, Marvin M Chun, Kwangsun Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minchul KimDepartment of Radiology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: minchulkbsmc@skku.edu.
Yae Ji KimDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Marvin M ChunDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Kwangsun YooDepartment of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; AI Research Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: rayksyoo@skku.edu.

Funding

Whole Brain Functional Connectivity Measures of AttentionR01MH108591 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHUN, MARVIN M · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based volumetric similarity network (VSN) offers an advantage in clinical settings due to its ease of acquisition and widespread availability. However, its validity, reliability, and behavioral relevance remain unclear. The present study aimed to assess the reproducibility and utility of the VSN as a foundation for future research and clinical applications. Here, we analyzed three datasets (total N = 354), with two datasets having repeated MR runs (Dataset 1: n = 86; Dataset 2: n = 49) and two having an attention measure (Datasets 1 and 3: n = 219). For each run and participant, the VSN was generated using interregional morphological similarity metrics. We examined whether the VSN reflects the brain's cytoarchitecture and assessed its test-retest reliability by using connectome fingerprints in Datasets 1 and 2. We also examined the VSN's behavioral relevance and further tested its predictive utility using connectome-based predictive modeling in Datasets 1 and 3. The VSN defined using the z-transformed interregional correlation showed significant spatial similarity with the cytoarchitectonic covariance network (rhos = 0.23 and 0.22 in Datasets 1 and 2, respectively; p < 0.01). The VSN also yielded high test-retest reliability, demonstrated by high identification accuracy (91% and 100% in Datasets 1 and 2, respectively). However, unlike the functional connectome (r > 0.31, p < 0.01), VSNs did not reliably predict individual differences in attention (r < 0.1, p > 0.3). This study demonstrates the biological validity and high reliability of the VSN to support brain fingerprinting of individual subjects, but not individual differences in attention.

Indexed as

AttentionBrainConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultBrain networkConnectome fingerprintingStructural MRIVolumetric similarity network (VSN)

Identifiers

PMID41833887
PMCPMC13035313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.