ArticleNeuroImage2026
Biological validity, test-retest reliability, and behavioral relevance of the single-subject brain volumetric similarity network.
Article in NeuroImage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based volumetric similarity network (VSN) offers an advantage in clinical settings due to its ease of acquisition and widespread availability. However, its validity, reliability, and behavioral relevance remain unclear. The present study aimed to assess the reproducibility and utility of the VSN as a foundation for future research and clinical applications. Here, we analyzed three datasets (total N = 354), with two datasets having repeated MR runs (Dataset 1: n = 86; Dataset 2: n = 49) and two having an attention measure (Datasets 1 and 3: n = 219). For each run and participant, the VSN was generated using interregional morphological similarity metrics. We examined whether the VSN reflects the brain's cytoarchitecture and assessed its test-retest reliability by using connectome fingerprints in Datasets 1 and 2. We also examined the VSN's behavioral relevance and further tested its predictive utility using connectome-based predictive modeling in Datasets 1 and 3. The VSN defined using the z-transformed interregional correlation showed significant spatial similarity with the cytoarchitectonic covariance network (rhos = 0.23 and 0.22 in Datasets 1 and 2, respectively; p < 0.01). The VSN also yielded high test-retest reliability, demonstrated by high identification accuracy (91% and 100% in Datasets 1 and 2, respectively). However, unlike the functional connectome (r > 0.31, p < 0.01), VSNs did not reliably predict individual differences in attention (r < 0.1, p > 0.3). This study demonstrates the biological validity and high reliability of the VSN to support brain fingerprinting of individual subjects, but not individual differences in attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.