ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2026
NOA masquerading as OA: Rethinking the role of testis biopsy from an East Asian perspective.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the proportion of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) cases exhibiting features resembling the obstructive azoospermia (OA) phenotype and assess the applicability of the Schoor criteria in an East Asian cohort.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed azoospermic patients who presented with low follicle-stimulating hormone level (≤9.2 IU/L) and large testicular volume (≥15 mL), consistent with the "phenotypical OA (phOA)" criteria proposed by Huang et al. All patients underwent a testicular biopsy to confirm the pathological diagnosis. Complete spermatogenesis was considered the key feature of "pathological OA (pOA)."
resultsA total of 271 patients with azoospermia were included in the analysis. Among them, 222 (81.9%) exhibited complete spermatogenesis consistent with pOA, whereas 49 (18.1%) were diagnosed with pathological NOA (pNOA). According to the Schoor criteria, 17 patients were classified as phOA; however, two (11.8%) were subsequently confirmed to have pNOA. Conversely, 31 patients were classified as having phNOA, of whom 23 (74.2%) demonstrated pOA on testicular biopsy. Under the Schoor criteria, the positive predictive value (PPV) for pOA was 88.2%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) for pOA was 25.8%. Using the Huang criteria, 49 of 271 patients (18.1%) met the definition of phOA but were diagnosed as pNOA on biopsy (ie, false positives), yielding a PPV of 81.9% for pOA.
conclusionThe Schoor criteria, derived from a Caucasian cohort, may be unsuitable for East Asian patients, given the much lower NPVs for pOA in our cohort (25.8%) than that in the Schoor study (92.3%). These findings highlight the limitations of relying solely on clinical criteria, either Schoor or Huang, to guide sperm retrieval strategies, including the choice of retrieval method and microsurgical approach. Therefore, a testicular biopsy is essential to confirm complete spermatogenesis in patients with clinically phOA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.