Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41833559›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026

Effects of Ceiling Fans on Self-Reported Symptoms and Mood-State in Bed-Resting Older Adults Exposed to Indoor Overheating.

Gregory W McGarr, Fergus K O'Connor, Glen P Kenny

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06142890 (Evaluating the Efficacy of Ceiling Fans for Limiting Heat Strain in Elderly Adults During Bed Rest in an Extreme Heat Event), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06142890 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating the Efficacy of Ceiling Fans for Limiting Heat Strain in Elderly Adults During Bed Rest in an Extreme Heat Event

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OttawaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsHyperthermia, Heat Stress, Cooling, AgingArmsNo cooling (control), Cooling with ceiling fan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gregory W McGarrHuman and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7454-7373
Fergus K O'ConnorHuman and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9509-7682
Glen P KennyHuman and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-6973

Funding

CIHR PJT-180242Health Canada 4500387992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile fans are recommended for cooling at temperatures ≤ 40°C, the extent to which ceiling fans mitigate perceptual and physiological strain in older adults exposed to warm indoor environments (~31°C [87.8°F]) remains unclear.

methodsThis follow-up analysis of our randomized study used validated questionnaires to evaluate effects of ceiling fans on self-reported heat-related symptoms (68-item Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire; ESQ-IV) and mood-state (40-item Profile of Mood States questionnaire; POMS-40) in bed-resting older adults during indoor overheating (8 h; 31°C (87.8°F), 45% relative humidity). Twenty participants (median age [interquartile range]: 71 [68-73] years; 12 females) completed two sessions with a ceiling fan set to 0 m/s (control) or ~1.5 m/s (fan). Perceptual outcomes (ESQ-IV, POMS-40) were assessed pre-exposure and at end heating. Cumulative physiological strain was assessed using area-under-the-curve (AUC) values for core temperature and heart rate over hours 0-8. End heating perceptual scores were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for pre-exposure scores and fan condition (with/without each physiological strain index).

resultsCore temperature and heart rate increased 0.15 [0.06, 0.24]°C (0.27 [0.11, 0.43]°F; p = 0.003), and 1.5 [0.5, 3.4] bpm (p = 0.135) per hour, respectively, with no-fan compared with fan use. After adjusting for core temperature AUC (p = 0.233), total symptom scores were 1.3-fold [1.1, 1.7] higher with no-fan (p = 0.015). Heart rate AUC did not modify this effect (p = 0.215); however, greater heart rate AUC was independently associated with higher symptom scores (p = 0.042). Mood disturbance did not differ between fan conditions and was not significantly associated with physiological strain markers (all p ≥ 0.187).

conclusionsCeiling fans alone do not fully mitigate perceptual or physiological strain in older adults exposed to prolonged indoor overheating. Nonetheless, a "fan-first" strategy integrating fan use with ambient cooling may offer an accessible, energy-efficient approach to enhance heat-health protection in this population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06142890.

Indexed as

AffectHeat Stress DisordersHot TemperatureAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesThermal Comfortcooling interventionheat stresssustainable coolingthermal perceptionthermoregulation

Identifiers

PMID41833559
PMCPMC13266453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.