Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41833521›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

A universal framework for IMRT dose prediction.

Qingying Wang, Mingli Chen, Yinheng Zhu, Mahdieh Kazemimoghadam, Kangning Zhang, Zi Yang, Hao Jiang, Xuejun Gu, Weiguo Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qingying WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Mingli ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Yinheng ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Mahdieh KazemimoghadamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Kangning ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Zi YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Hao JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Xuejun GuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Weiguo LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Funding

An artificial intelligence-driven distributed stereotactic radiosurgery strategy for multiple brain metastases managementR01CA235723 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GU, XUEJUN, LU, WEIGUO · 2019 to 2024
$2.9M
SBIR TOPIC 417: QUANTITATIVE IMAGING SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR CANCER DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT PLANNING75N91023C00032 · NCI · NEURALRAD LLC · PI JIANG, HAO · 2023 to 2023
$2.0M
High-Precision Proton Therapy for Liver Cancer: Developing an End-to-end Strategy with Real-time Liver Tumor Localization and On-the-fly Plan Delivery AdaptationR01CA280135 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Weiguo Lu, You Zhang · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
High-Precision Lung Radiotherapy by Intra-treatment Dynamic Cone-beam CT imaging and Dosimetry-guided Plan AdaptationR01EB034691 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Weiguo Lu, You Zhang · 2024 to 2026
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235723NCI NIH HHS R01 CA280135NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB034691NIH HHS 1R01EB034691-01NIH HHS 75N91023C00032NIH HHS R01 CA235723-01NIH HHS R01CA280135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDose prediction has great potential in improving plan quality and efficiency by estimating optimal dose distribution. However, most existing deep learning (DL) based dose prediction models for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) have been primarily developed under simplified conditions, such as fixed beam configuration and/or disease site. These constraints limit the generalizability and clinical usability of such models across the diverse scenarios encountered in real-world practice. PURPOSE: We proposed a DL-based universal dose prediction model, named UniDose, designed to accommodate a wide range of disease sites and support diverse clinical scenarios, especially for IMRT treatment plans with arbitrary beam configurations.

methodsUniDose is built on a customized nnU-Net framework, adapted into an image-to-image mapping network tailored for 3D dose prediction and trained using the Huber loss. The network takes three generalized input channels: a normalized prescription dose map that encodes planning goals for the target, a weighted avoidance mask that consolidates multiple organs at risk (OARs) and body structures into a single channel with clinical relevance-based voxel weights, and a beam trace image that captures beam configuration using a non-modulated, cumulative dose approximation generated via a ray-tracing based algorithm. The model was trained, validated and tested on a heterogeneous dataset of 871 patients encompassing 25 disease sites and a wide spectrum of prescription doses and beam configurations. To assess the deliverability of the predicted dose, we incorporated a reference-based in-house optimization engine into the UniDose framework to generate feasible plans constrained by machine limitations. Model performance was evaluated by comparing predicted doses, optimized doses, and clinical plans using gamma passing rate (GPR) with a 3%/2 mm criteria and 10% lower dose threshold and dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics.

resultsThe UniDose predictions achieved an average GPR of 92.36% compared to the optimized doses and demonstrated strong DVH consistency. The average GPR between predicted and clinical doses was 86.13%. DVH comparisons showed that the predictions and the optimized dose achieved improved OAR sparing while maintaining comparable target coverage relative to clinical dose, particularly in prostate, liver, and brain cases. Case studies across six disease sites with variable beam configurations further confirmed that the predicted and optimized doses exhibited similar dose deposition patterns along beam paths, suggesting that the predicted dose is physically feasible and approachable following dose optimization. Additionally, adjusting voxel weights in the avoidance input channel enabled flexible trade-offs between OAR sparing and target coverage, supporting patient-specific treatment planning.

conclusionsUniDose demonstrates strong potential as a universal DL-based dose prediction framework capable of generalizing across diverse disease sites and beam configurations. By combining a generalized input design, robust network customization, and integration with a reference-guided optimization engine, UniDose generates physically feasible dose predictions and allows efficient user interaction through adjustable input conditions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiation DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy Dosagedeep learningdose predictionradiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID41833521
PMCPMC12989320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.