ArticlePharmaceutical statistics
Penalized Variable Selection for Joint AFT Random-Effect Model With Clustered Competing-Risks Data.
Article in Pharmaceutical statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clustered competing-risks data often arise in clinical studies, such as multi-center clinical trials, where the occurrence of an event within a cluster hinders the observation of other types of events. The correlation resulting from clustering can be modeled using random effects. These competing-risks data have usually been analyzed using hazard-based models, rather than survival times themselves. Hao et al. proposed a cause-specific joint accelerated failure time (AFT) random-effect modeling approach for analyzing the clustered competing-risks data, which is easy to interpret. In this article, we propose a variable selection method for fixed effects using a penalized h-likelihood (HL) procedure in the joint AFT competing-risk model. Simulation studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed variable selection procedure, which concluded that the penalized methods of SCAD and HL are more appropriate than that of LASSO. The proposed method is illustrated with two real clinical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.