SynthesisThe Angle orthodontist2026
Predictability of clear aligners in achieving planned dental arch expansion during mixed dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the predictability of Invisalign First in achieving planned dental arch expansion in mixed dentition. Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD420251083929), electronic databases were searched up to July 2025. Eligible studies included data evaluating Invisalign First for dental arch expansion in mixed dentition. Predictability, defined as ratio of achieved to planned expansion, was the primary outcome. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed separately for maxillary and mandibular arches using binomial modeling on logit scale. Correlation analyses and univariate linear regression were conducted to assess the relationship between planned expansion and achieved predictability, globally and by arch and tooth group. Risk of bias was evaluated with ROBINS-I and publication bias by funnel plot and Egger's and Begg's tests. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Results: Nine studies were included in the systematic review and eight in the meta-analysis. Pooled predictability of expansion in the maxilla was 65%, with the lowest at permanent first molars (58%) and the highest at deciduous canines (70%). Expansion in the mandible showed higher predictability (71%), peaking at deciduous canines (75%). Correlation and regression analyses found no significant association between amount of planned expansion and achieved predictability in any subgroup. No evidence of publication bias was found, and findings remained robust on sensitivity analysis. GRADE certainty was low (maxilla) and moderate (mandible). Conclusions: Invisalign First demonstrates modest to moderate predictability for dental arch expansion in mixed dentition, particularly in the mandibular arch and anterior teeth, though limitations persist in the posterior maxilla.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.