Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41833315›Full record

SynthesisThe Angle orthodontist2026

Predictability of clear aligners in achieving planned dental arch expansion during mixed dentition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marco Serafin, Elisa Boccalari, Alberto Caprioglio

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco Serafin
Elisa Boccalari
Alberto Caprioglio

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the predictability of Invisalign First in achieving planned dental arch expansion in mixed dentition. Materials and Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines and a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD420251083929), electronic databases were searched up to July 2025. Eligible studies included data evaluating Invisalign First for dental arch expansion in mixed dentition. Predictability, defined as ratio of achieved to planned expansion, was the primary outcome. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed separately for maxillary and mandibular arches using binomial modeling on logit scale. Correlation analyses and univariate linear regression were conducted to assess the relationship between planned expansion and achieved predictability, globally and by arch and tooth group. Risk of bias was evaluated with ROBINS-I and publication bias by funnel plot and Egger's and Begg's tests. Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Results: Nine studies were included in the systematic review and eight in the meta-analysis. Pooled predictability of expansion in the maxilla was 65%, with the lowest at permanent first molars (58%) and the highest at deciduous canines (70%). Expansion in the mandible showed higher predictability (71%), peaking at deciduous canines (75%). Correlation and regression analyses found no significant association between amount of planned expansion and achieved predictability in any subgroup. No evidence of publication bias was found, and findings remained robust on sensitivity analysis. GRADE certainty was low (maxilla) and moderate (mandible). Conclusions: Invisalign First demonstrates modest to moderate predictability for dental arch expansion in mixed dentition, particularly in the mandibular arch and anterior teeth, though limitations persist in the posterior maxilla.

Indexed as

Dental ArchDentition, MixedOrthodontic Appliances, RemovablePalatal Expansion TechniqueHumansClear alignersInvisalign FirstMeta-analysisPredictabilitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41833315
PMCPMC13277327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.