ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026
Pharmacokinetics and Analgesic Efficacy of a Novel Extended-Release Buprenorphine Formulation in Mice.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-acting buprenorphine formulations present a remarkable refinement for the care and management of postoperative pain in rodents. We describe here the evaluation of a novel extended-release buprenorphine formulation (Bup ER) for use in laboratory mice. The pharmacokinetics of a single subcutaneous dose of Bup ER (5 mg/kg) were characterized in male and female CD-1 mice at 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 168 hours postinjection. Plasma buprenorphine concentrations exceeded 1 ng/mL within 0.5 hours and were maintained above this threshold for up to 120 hours postadministration. The analgesic efficacy of Bup ER was assessed using a tail flick thermal nociception assay and a plantar incisional hypersensitivity model. Mice received Bup ER (5 mg/kg SC, once) or saline (subcutaneously, once) prior to tail flick nociception testing or plantar incisional surgery with corresponding mechanical (von Frey) and thermal (Hargreaves) hypersensitivity testing. Tail flick thermal nociception testing for male and female CD-1 mice indicated significant differences in maximum possible effect between Bup ER and saline groups from 0.5 to 96 hours. Mechanical hypersensitivity was not observed in male or female Bup ER-treated groups for up to 96 hours. Although thermal hypersensitivity was observed in male and female mice that received Bup ER, mice presented significantly less thermal hypersensitivity (attenuation) compared with the saline group from 1 to 48 hours. No abnormal clinical observations were appreciated. Gross findings revealed mild erythema or alopecia at the injection site, and 3 mice developed skin ulcerations that were attributed to injection technique where use of small-gauge needles led to administration into the intradermal compared with subcutaneous space. Ulcerative lesions were not observed after procedures to confirm injection site administration were implemented. Bup ER provided effective postoperative analgesia for 48-96 hours in mice and demonstrated an extended plasma concentration profile up to 120 hours for long-acting analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.