ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
Nursing Students' Experiences With Artificial Intelligence: A Qualitative Study on Education, Clinical Practice, and Future Expectations.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI Use, Perceptions, and Perceived Impact Among Nursing Students: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the rapid advancement of technology in healthcare, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important tool in nursing education and clinical practice. However, there is limited knowledge regarding nursing students' experiences with AI, its areas of use, and their expectations.
aimThis study aimed to explore nursing students' experiences with AI and to reveal its role in nursing education, clinical practice, and future expectations.
methodsA qualitative phenomenological design was used. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 14 nursing students from a state university who had been using AI between June and August 2025. Data were collected using a Demographic Information Form and a Semi-Structured Interview Form. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis method with the support of MAXQDA software.
resultsSix main themes and fourteen subthemes emerged: (1) First encounters with AI and sources of information, (2) AI in nursing education, (3) AI in clinical practice, (4) Benefits of AI, (5) Limitations and concerns regarding AI, and (6) Future expectations and recommendations.
conclusionNursing students perceived AI as a supportive tool but emphasized that it cannot replace human-centered care, empathy, or therapeutic communication. The findings highlight the need to integrate AI into nursing education and clinical practice within an ethical and pedagogical framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.