Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832735›Full record

ReviewMini reviews in medicinal chemistry2026

Computational Innovations in Cancer Research and How Computing is Transforming Drug Discovery and Development: A Review.

Ilavanalangki Lytan, Basanta Singha, Nichan Boruah, Partha Pratim Gogoi, Penlisola Longkumer, Mhasilhoutuo Pucho, Beware Dkhar, Upasana Bora Sinha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilavanalangki LytanDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0009-0000-9953-3867
Basanta SinghaDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4545-8587
Nichan BoruahDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0009-0008-9605-9061
Partha Pratim GogoiDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0009-0009-9155-1265
Penlisola LongkumerDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0009-0008-4726-1132
Mhasilhoutuo PuchoDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0009-0004-7425-0202
Beware DkharDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0009-0006-0824-8432
Upasana Bora SinhaDepartment of Chemistry, Nagaland University, Lumami, Zunheboto, Nagaland, 798627, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8598-5173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer is a major global health concern, causing millions of deaths each year due to the uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, its complexity and therapy resistance keep it a leading cause of mortality. This review highlights the impact of CADD and related computational approaches in advancing cancer research and therapy.

methodsThis literature review examined studies on CADD in cancer research, focusing on its use in drug discovery, target identification, and compound optimization. It describes how CADD accelerates drug development, reduces costs, and supports the design of more selective anticancer agents. DISCUSSION: Traditional experimental methods are time-consuming, costly, and limited in predictive power. Computational innovations such as CADD, AI, ML, and quantum computing enable rational drug design, predictive modeling, and efficient target prioritization. Early-stage challenges illustrated by PROTACs, EGFR inhibitors, miRNA therapeutics, and T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies include issues related to selectivity, toxicity, drug resistance, and limitations of preclinical models. Although tumor biomarkers aid detection and monitoring, sensitivity and reproducibility remain concerns. AI, ML, and quantum computing enhance screening, toxicity prediction, and the simulation of protein-ligand interactions. Despite regulatory and clinical hurdles, integrating genomics, proteomics, imaging, and computational approaches offers a path toward more effective, personalized cancer therapies.

resultsIn this review study, it was found that computer-aided drug design and related computational approaches have significantly enhanced cancer drug discovery. Several methods including molecular docking, molecular dynamics, QSAR, virtual screening and AI/ML driven models have accelerated target identification, lead optimization and prediction of efficacy, toxicity and resistance. In multiple instances, integration of multi-omics data has improved biomarker discovery and patient stratification. Several case studies on EGFR, PARP, KRAS G12C and immunotherapy targets have demonstrated reduced development time and improved selectivity. Overall, computational innovations have streamlined anticancer drug development while providing substantial leads for experimental validation.

conclusionCADD is transforming cancer research by accelerating drug discovery, optimizing target interactions, and aiding the design of selective agents. Its limitations include reliance on structural data, high computational demands, and the need for experimental validation. Future efforts should integrate AI, machine learning, and multi-omics data to improve predictive accuracy and accelerate therapy development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryNeoplasmsDrug DesignHumansAntineoplastic Agentsai-driven drug designComputer-aided drug design (CADD)in-silico drug discoverymolecular dockingprecision oncologytumour heterogeneity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.