Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832594›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2026

The cognitive connectome of men and women: a study on sex differences across three cohorts.

Daphne Gasparre, Annegret Habich, Lídia Mulet-Pons, Roraima Yanez-Perez, Eric Westman, José Barroso, Lídia Vaque-Alcázar, David Bartres-Faz, Paolo Taurisano, Daniel Ferreira and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daphne GasparreDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annegret HabichDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lídia Mulet-PonsDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Roraima Yanez-PerezDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands, Spain.
Eric WestmanDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
José BarrosoFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Fernando Pessoa Canarias, Las Palmas, Spain.
Lídia Vaque-AlcázarDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
David Bartres-FazDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Paolo TaurisanoDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBraiN), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Daniel FerreiraDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Centre for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. daniel.ferreira.padilla@ki.se.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive processes are essential for efficient daily functioning. Demographic factors such as age and education influence cognitive performance. However, the impact of sex on cognition is less understood and previous research has reported inconsistent findings. We investigated sex differences in cognitively unimpaired adults in three cohorts, using two complimentary approaches: a univariate approach to compare direct performance across cognitive domains and the multivariate approach of graph theory to compare global and nodal features as well as the modular organization of cognitive connectomes.

methodsWe included 4,259 cognitively unimpaired participants (334 from the GENIC cohort, 3,703 from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center [NACC], and 222 from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ADNI]). Cognitive variables were corrected for age and education, and cognitive connectomes were constructed using Spearman correlation coefficients. Sex differences in cognitive performance were examined through ANCOVAs as well as global and nodal network measures.

resultsUnivariate analyses showed significant sex differences in three out of five cognitive domains across cohorts, mainly of small effect sizes. Graph theory analyses revealed minimal sex differences in cognitive module organization and no significant differences on global network measures, except for a higher modularity observed in women compared to men in the NACC. In contrast, nodal analyses revealed sex differences in several network measures.

conclusionsSex differences in cognition seem to be of small effect size and limited to specific cognitive domains or cognitive variables, while the overall organization and global features of cognitive connectomes were largely comparable between men and women. Future studies should clarify whether men and women may rely on slightly different cognitive strategies to approach cognitive tasks without overt differences in cognitive ability.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionConnectomeSex CharacteristicsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCognitive connectomeGenderGraph theoryHealthy aging

Identifiers

PMID41832594
PMCPMC13063598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.