ArticleJournal of eating disorders2026
Profiling decision-making mechanisms in binge eating disorder.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBinge eating disorder (BED) is a highly prevalent mental disorder associated with metabolic complications, reduced functioning, and poor quality of life, resulting in significant disease burden. Disordered decision-making is thought to drive behaviour in BED, but the specific mechanisms underlying this dysfunction remain unclear.
methodsThis study compared multiple aspects of decision-making between people with BED and higher weight (BED, n = 57), a control group matched by body mass index (BMI) without binge eating (HWC, n = 54), and lower weight controls (LWC, n = 54). We applied profile analyses to cognitive measures capturing three stages of decision-making: preference formation, choice implementation, and feedback processing. Additionally, we examined domains of psychological functioning shown to interact with cognitive mechanisms during decision-making - negative emotionality, maladaptive eating-related tendencies, and impulsive traits.
resultsWe found generalised decision-making dysfunction in individuals with BED compared to the LWC but not the HWC group. However, BMI did not explain these differences. Poor overall psychological functioning clearly distinguished BED from both control groups, with elevated depressive symptoms and lack of perseverance emerging as key psychological characteristics. DISCUSSION: By mapping BED profiles across multiple components of decision-making, our findings indicate that domain-general cognitive dysfunction is an important mechanism in BED, alongside more well-recognised psychological features. These findings may further efforts to refine aetiological models of binge eating, providing more holistic and explanatory theories. They may also form a foundation for novel interventions and personalised approaches to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.