ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2026
Impact of educational workshops on breastfeeding practices in traditional Chinese postpartum centres: a cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostpartum Chinese mothers in Malaysia traditionally observe a 30-day confinement period, many choosing to stay in privately run traditional postpartum centres, known locally as confinement centres (CCs). Following a 2017 cohort study that identified gaps in breastfeeding support and hygiene practices, three participatory needs-based educational workshops were delivered to CC staff. A new cohort of mothers was recruited in 2019 to evaluate the same outcomes after the intervention.
methodsEthnic Chinese mothers with healthy term infants who intended to breastfeed were recruited at delivery and followed up until six months postpartum. Using semi-structured telephone interviews, the following data was collected: exclusive and direct breastfeeding, rooming-in, breastfeeding problems, hygiene indicators, and infant health. Comparisons were made between mothers staying in CCs and home in the current cohort, and with the 2017 cohort. Quantitative data were analysed using chi-squared tests, t-tests, and logistic regression; qualitative responses were analysed thematically.
resultsWe recruited 206 mothers (103 CC, 103 home) and excluded four who did not stay as intended (3 CC, 1 home). Data collection coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic. Fewer CC mothers reported breastfeeding problems compared to 2017. However, gaps such as limited rooming-in and preference for expressed milk remained; and exclusive breastfeeding rates at six months did not differ significantly between groups or cohorts. Some hygiene practices in CCs improved, but perceived staff hand hygiene practices remained suboptimal. Interestingly, one-month exclusive breastfeeding rates declined for both CC and home groups in 2019 compared to 2017. Direct breastfeeding in 2019 also fell, and mothers who did not directly breastfeed were less likely to sustain exclusive breastfeeding at six months. Post-hoc interviews suggested COVID-19 had limited influence on most mothers’ breastfeeding intentions, though subtle disruptions in breastfeeding support may have contributed to lower exclusive breastfeeding rates.
conclusionsTraining alone is insufficient to improve practices in Malaysian CCs. As CCs gain popularity, strategies that go beyond staff training, including regulatory oversight, public education, and integration of CCs into national maternal–child health systems are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.