Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832568›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026

Pathogenesis of gaseous microemboli in cardiac surgery. a comprehensive overview of deairing procedures, operative interactions and risk factors to mitigate postoperative cerebral disorders.

Tristan Ehrlich, Piccoli Juliette, Thomas Klein, Elodie Phamisith, Laina Hereson, Nguyen Tran, Philippe Guerci, Daniel Grandmougin, Juan-Pablo Maureira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tristan EhrlichDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy University of Lorraine, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, 54500, France.
Piccoli JulietteDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy University of Lorraine, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, 54500, France.
Thomas KleinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Elodie PhamisithDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy University of Lorraine, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, 54500, France.
Laina HeresonDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy University of Lorraine, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, 54500, France.
Nguyen TranSchool of Surgery, CHRU Nancy University of Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Philippe GuerciDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Daniel GrandmouginDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy University of Lorraine, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, 54500, France. d.grandmougin@me.com.
Juan-Pablo MaureiraDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, ILCV Louis Mathieu, CHRU Nancy University of Lorraine, Rue du Morvan, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, 54500, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to ensure both surgical safety and reliability, operative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery requires stringent standards and awareness from cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists. Among these standards, deairing cardiac chambers and reducing production of gaseous embolism, after open heart surgery, remain a crucial step and a major challenge to alleviate dire and life-threatening complications. Therefore, deairing maneuvers necessitate caution and methodology to reduce incidence of neurological complications and systemic side effects.

methodsIn order to provide an overview of existing literature about, deairing procedures in cardiac surgery, factors involved in pathogenesis of gaseous microemboli, available options to improve brain monitoring and discuss whether new recommendations might still be relevant to improve neurological postoperative outcome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, this narrative review encompassed specific and relevant searches in PubMed, Copernicus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases.

results55 and 72 studies were retrieved in the past 40 years with the focus of deairing procedures and pathogenesis of gaseous microemboli respectively. The multiple techniques reported to achieve appropriate deairing of cardiac chambers are well standardized and necessitate to be highlighted and regularly rehearsed since they demand awareness about potential cerebral and systemic deleterious complications related to air embolism. This review showed efficacy of dearing maneuvers as long as they follow strict and adequate guidelines and confirmed that a « zero-risk» is not a realistic option since use of CPB as well as patient comorbidity factors obviously influence occurence of air embolic side-effects.

conclusionsFinally, irrespective of efficient deairing procedures, understanding factors involved in pathogenesis of gaseous microemboli combined with a rigorous and rationale preoperative identification of patient-related risks to predict cerebral disorders are likely the key points of this major issue.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresEmbolism, AirPostoperative ComplicationsHumansRisk FactorsBrain disordersCarbon dioxide insufflationCardiac surgeryCPB (Cardio Pulmonary Bypass)Dearing proceduresGaseous microemboliInfrared spectroscopy)MBM (Multimodal brain monitoring)NIRS (NearRisk factorsTEE (Transesophageal echography)

Identifiers

PMID41832568
PMCPMC13101233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.