ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Scoring patterns and player roles in the International Baskin Tournament: a statistical analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Baskin is an inclusive team sport that allows individuals with and without disabilities to play together, with roles and scoring systems adapted to functional abilities. Despite its innovative design, Baskin remains little studied at the international level, particularly in relation to the technical and tactical factors that influence competitive outcomes. The present study analyzed scoring distributions and point production patterns at the International Baskin Tournament held in Tortona, Italy, in September 2024, within the framework of the Eurohoop for All 2.0 project. A total of 527 points from eight games were examined according to basket type (traditional or side), shooting position, and player role, in line with official Baskin rules. Results showed that higher-ranked teams scored a greater proportion of their total points on the traditional basket, while points from the side sector of the side basket were also more frequent among these teams. Role 5 players contributed the majority of points, underlining their decisive impact, whereas role 2 and role 3 players provided important contributions through side-basket play. By contrast, the numerical value of the points (1, 2, or 3) did not differentiate between winning and losing teams. These findings suggest that success in Baskin is shaped not by point values themselves but by the functional integration of different roles and the tactical exploitation of multiple scoring opportunities, underscoring both the competitive and inclusive dimensions of the sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.