ArticleVirology journal2026
Leveraging the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing platform for HIV-1 drug resistance surveillance in resource-limited settings: a post-COVID implementation opportunity.
Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Precision Public Health: an implementation science framework for HIV Cluster Detection and Response driven by molecular epidemiology.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing remains essential for optimizing antiretroviral therapy (ART), yet access remains constrained by high cost, low throughput, and limited availability of Sanger sequencing in resource-limited settings (RLS). Recent improvements in Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing offer a potential alternative, especially following the expansion of genomic surveillance infrastructure established during the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsA cross-sectional laboratory validation study was conducted comparing ONT MinION sequencing with Sanger sequencing for HIV-1 protease/reverse transcriptase (PR/RT) and integrase (IN) genotyping. Sixty-four stored amplicons from patients with virological failure on second-line protease inhibitor (PI)- or integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-based regimens were sequenced on the MinION Mk1C (R10.4.1). ONT-derived consensus sequences were generated using a custom pipeline and compared to Sanger reference sequences to assess nucleotide identity and drug resistance mutation (DRM) concordance using the Stanford HIVdb v9.8. We also evaluated the cost and scalability of ONT to determine its feasibility for broader implementation.
resultsONT MinION sequencing produced high-quality consensus sequences with a median pairwise identity of 99.4% (IQR: 99.2-99.7). After resolving initial discrepancies through chromatogram review and high-depth Nanopore data, high concordance for major DRMs was observed across PR, RT, and IN coding regions. Using a 48-sample multiplexing configuration, the estimated reagent and consumable cost for ONT sequencing was approximately US$23.47 per sample. Published Sanger-based HIV drug resistance assays report per-sample costs in the range of approximately US$43 to US$100, although costs vary depending on laboratory workflow and testing volume. Moreover, ONT provided a substantially shorter turnaround time (~ 5 h from library prep to sequence data), offering a more efficient and cost-effective workflow overall.
conclusionsONT MinION sequencing provides an accurate, rapid, and cost-effective alternative to Sanger sequencing for HIVDR genotyping in RLS. Its scalability, ability to detect minority variants, and compatibility with infrastructure setup up in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, make it a viable platform for both national HIVDR surveillance and decentralized clinical testing. Integrating ONT workflows into routine HIVDR monitoring could expand diagnostic access and enable more timely ART optimization in high-burden settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.