ArticleBMC health services research2026
Dynamic demand forecasting and capacity assessment for emergency care system: a hybrid time series and machine learning approach with evidence from Beijing.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately forecasting the demand of emergency care system (ECS) and assessing the system capacity are critical for effective resource allocation and crisis preparedness. This study aims to develop a robust hybrid forecasting framework to predict patient demand and identify critical capacity thresholds in Beijing’s ECS under varying operational conditions. Using comprehensive data on 120 ambulance dispatches and hospital emergency department admissions from 2019 to 2024, the data are explicitly categorized into normal and peak periods, enabling state-specific analyses that reflect the distinct operational dynamics of each mode. The analysis reveals that normal period data exhibit strong seasonality and nonlinearity, while peak periods follow a three-phase pattern: initial resource stress, capacity expansion, and system recovery. To capture the complex temporal dynamics of emergency care system, both time series models (ARIMA, VAR, Prophet) and machine learning models (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) were applied, the comparison analysis results show that machine learning models, particularly CatBoost and LightGBM, outperform traditional approaches in capturing nonlinear relationships, while Prophet excels in long-term trend and seasonality modeling. Consequently, an ensemble average model combining these three models could yield robust and accurate forecasts. Further scenario tests based on the ensemble model identified two key system capacity expansion thresholds: emergency bed use nearing 2,100 beds and a bed usage-to-patient ratio dropping to 6.5%–6.0%. The framework offers a practical, transferable approach for forecasting demand and guiding resource allocation in urban emergency systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.