Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832489›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Qualitative assessment of a novel results-based partnership between national wastewater surveillance centers of excellence and utility companies, Houston (Texas), Colorado, Wisconsin, and California, 2023.

Hannah Turner, Libby Horter, Michael Welton, Cristina Martinez, Rieza Soelaeman, Kathleen Tatti, Souci Louis, Amy Kirby, Nicole Fehrenbach, John Person and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hannah TurnerU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Libby HorterU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Michael WeltonU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Cristina MartinezU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Rieza SoelaemanU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Kathleen TattiU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Souci LouisU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Amy KirbyU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Nicole FehrenbachU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
John PersonU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Scott SantibañezU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Diana ValenciaU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Building 24, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. ile9@cdc.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initiated the National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS) in September 2020. Four initial Centers of Excellence (COEs) were established between 2021 and 2023 in Houston (Texas), Colorado, Wisconsin, and California to guide wastewater surveillance efforts for public health. Our objective was to increase understanding of factors that facilitated implementation of wastewater surveillance from the perspectives and experiences shared by health department COEs and wastewater utility partners.

methodsWe used purposive sampling to select one key respondents from each of the four COEs and four respective wastewater utility partners. We conducted eight in-depth interviews related to the implementation of wastewater surveillance and identified common experiences and key points from interview transcription files. Insights on WWS implementation from COEs and wastewater utility partners were distilled from the responses into lessons learned.

resultsThree primary themes emerged after we analyzed the interview responses: perceived community benefits from wastewater surveillance, collaboration and trust building among partners that helped program advancement, and sustainability strategies and considerations.

conclusionThis analysis provides insights into novel collaborations between utility companies and the public health sector. It highlights the need to have leadership support for program continuation and to help showcase the public health importance of WWS.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWastewaterCaliforniaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.ColoradoHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchTexasUnited StatesWastewaterCenters of ExcellenceInfectious DiseasesNational Wastewater SurveillancePartnershipsQualitative StudySurveillanceUtility Companies

Identifiers

PMID41832489
PMCPMC13101207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.