ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
A clinical prediction tool for ocular hypertension following silicone oil tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to develop predictive models for identifying risk factors of postoperative IOP elevation in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) following silicone oil (SO) tamponade.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 533 RRD patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between September 1, 2024, and June 19, 2025. IOP was measured postoperatively on day 1, week 1, and months 1, 3, 6, and before SO removal using the non-contact tonometer Corvis Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) to acquire biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP). Multiple machine learning (ML) models and one nomogram were constructed using demographic, clinical, and surgical factors.
resultsPostoperatively, 57.8% of patients developed elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), with 81.5% occurring within two weeks. A Stepwise GLM [forward] + SVM model based on clinical features outperformed the Nomogram (AUC 0.761 vs. 0.729). The top five predictors were axial length (AL), age, white-to-white corneal diameter (WTW), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), and central corneal thickness (CCT).
conclusionIn RRD patients receiving silicone oil tamponade, AL, age, WTW, PVR, and CCT were closely associated with postoperative IOP elevation. The ML models outperformed nomogram in accuracy and clinical interpretability, offering a reliable tool utilizing bIOP for early IOP risk assessment and postoperative management in RRD patients. Their integration of anatomical and biometric features supports real-world clinical deployment and individualized care planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.