ArticleBMC women's health2026
Low-dose mifepristone for the management of refractory heavy menstrual bleeding in women with bleeding disorders: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phase-Based Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women with Bleeding Disorders: From Acute Control to Long-Term Maintenance.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common and debilitating condition in women with bleeding disorders (BD). The underlying hemostatic abnormalities in these patients often make standard treatments ineffective. Clinical management is complicated in women with moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia or those receiving antithrombotic therapy. To date, research addressing these two patient groups remains limited, with few safe and effective treatment options available due to their heightened bleeding risk. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate low-dose mifepristone as a bridge therapy for refractory HMB in women with BD.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted among women aged 10-55 years with BD and refractory HMB, treated with mifepristone at the Department of Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, from 2010 to 2024. For some patients with acute severe bleeding, intrauterine balloon tamponade were initially used, followed by mifepristone therapy maintained for at least two months. In patients with chronic bleeding, mifepristone was initiated at any point during the menstrual cycle. The primary endpoint was change in pictorial blood assessment chart (PBAC) score. Secondary endpoints included hemoglobin levels, amenorrhea rate, Menorrhagia Multi-Attribute Scale (MMAS) scores, and safety parameters. Continuous paired comparisons were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and repeated measurements using the Friedman test with Bonferroni correction.
resultsA total of 63 patients met the inclusion criteria, with the study cohort primarily comprising 48 cases of thrombocytopenia of diverse etiologies and 13 patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Following one month of treatment, the median PBAC score decreased from 385 to 0, while median hemoglobin levels increased from 51 g/L to 84 g/L (Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.01). Amenorrhea was achieved in 92.1% of patients by one month, and in all evaluable patients by three months. MMAS scores improved. No thromboembolic events or clinically relevant coagulation abnormalities were observed. Liver function remained stable, with only transient enzyme elevations, which were attributed to chemotherapy.
conclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, low-dose mifepristone was associated with improved bleeding control and acceptable tolerability. It may serve as a potential bridge therapy for women with BD and refractory HMB. Prospective controlled studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.