SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
A systematic review of factors contributing to partners' negative birth experiences.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost partners attend the birth of their infant. Partners can be psychologically impacted by the birth they witness. It is important to understand what may contribute to this experience being appraised as negative, so that services can develop support for partners. This systematic review aimed to explore partners’ reported negative experiences of childbirth. The objective was to synthesise qualitative literature on aspects of experience that contributed to partners appraising childbirth as negative. ENTREQ framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research was used to report findings.
methodsA qualitative meta-synthesis design was adopted. Searches were conducted using the databases PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, EMCare, and Web of Science using search terms relating to partners and childbirth experiences. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to assess the quality of the included studies.
resultsSixteen studies were included in the review. Themes generated from the meta-synthesis were ‘high negative emotionality during the birth’, ‘unprepared/not going as expected’, ‘communication from healthcare professionals’, ‘exclusion’, ‘clarity of role’, and ‘perceived low control’.
conclusionsPartners experienced intense negative emotions, particularly when births did not go as expected, and these feelings were amplified by poor communication, exclusion, and uncertainty about their role. Feeling unprepared, both practically and emotionally, and perceiving a lack of control were central contributors to negative experiences. Partners’ experiences were shaped not only by the birth itself but also by the quality of healthcare interactions and the clarity of their own role, with cultural context further influencing expectations and emotional responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.