ArticleBMC public health2026
The implementation and refinement of a national institute for physical activity, health and sport.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecognition of the importance and value of collaboration and involving stakeholders throughout the research process has given rise to the establishment of the Welsh Institute for Physical Activity, Health and Sport (WIPAHS). Globally, formal collaborations between researchers and stakeholders to complete research projects, remains insufficient. Therefore, the primary aim of WIPAHS is to engage in long-term, forward-thinking collaborations that address practice-informed research questions, to disseminate findings widely, and translate them into practice and policy. This study explored the implementation and subsequent refinement of a national institute for physical activity, health, and sport.
methodsThrough a qualitative exploratory design, thirteen, individual, semi-structured, online interviews were conducted with academic members of the WIPAHS Research Steering Group. The data were thematically analysed by the research team to identify themes and subsequently used to formulate a set of Principles of Working.
resultsFifteen sub-themes were generated which led to eight Principles of Working emphasising national unity and the commitment to working collaboratively across all of Wales, UK, for the benefit of Wales. The role of collaboration in amplifying real-world impact was particularly highlighted; collaborative efforts between academics and stakeholders, underpinned by a clear structure and equal opportunities, were believed to facilitate a reduction in research duplication and optimal efficiency.
conclusionFormalising the developmental process and the resulting Principles of Working provides a replicable blueprint for other academics to consider creating similar national institutes. This approach enables co-ordinated, systems-wide efforts to promote and advance health-enhancing physical activity and sport, offering a model for others seeking a comprehensive approach to achieve these goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.