ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Mapped deletions in a publicly available Fast Neutron mutant collection for gene identification in pea.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFast Neutron induced mutants in the background of Pisum sativum (pea) JI2822 have been described in several studies. Here, we sought to organise this collection of mutagenized lineages to make them accessible, to investigate the type and frequency of mutations and to investigate their utility for systematic screening for mutants.
resultsWe investigated the use of Axiom markers to detect deletion mutations by screening for null alleles, and compared this method to low coverage sequencing, where variation in read mapping depth was used to detect deletions. These mutation screens identified many large deletions, but duplications were also found. The deletion mutations were not necessarily single contiguous spans. Some involved one or more nearby locations, implying that Fast Neutron induced mutations can be complex. We identified PsMYB32 as the Fuscopurpureus (Cr) gene and we propose candidate genes for other mutations affecting floral architecture and wax deposition. The identification of PsMYB32 as Cr suggested PsMYB37 as a candidate for the Roseus (Ce) gene and the evidence for this is discussed.
conclusionsOur analysis of 210 M2 derived families by the skim-sequencing method identified deletions that cover a little over 15% of the pea genome. This suggests that the population of approximately 5,000 families should contain deletions covering a substantial fraction of the pea genome. We detected hemizygous deletions, so mutants severely compromised in fertility or viability may be accessible for study in this population. The public availability of this resource should facilitate further gene identification in pea; this study provides the background data to support further characterisation of these lines by sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.