SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Safety and efficacy of short-term ventricular assist devices in paediatric heart transplant candidates: a systematic review and single arm meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSafety and efficacy of short-term ventricular assist devices (VAD) remains incompletely understood, particularly in younger children. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate outcomes, including bridging success, complications, and mortality, associated with short-term VAD support in paediatric heart transplant candidates.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to 2 December 2024. Eligible studies reported patients ≤ 18 years supported by short-term VADs. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023468125).
resultsTwelve retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 532 paediatric patients (mean age 10.0 years, < 0.1–18.3, mean weight 39.5 ± 30.3 kg). Pooled proportions show that with a mean support duration of 15.2 days, 50.7% were successfully bridged to transplant (95% CI 36.4%, 65.0%; I2 = 91.1%) with a 24.8% waitlist mortality (95% CI 17.6%, 31.9%; I2 = 63.8%), 14.0% (95% CI 7.2%, 20.9%; I2 = 97.5%) weaned off support and 5.4% (95% CI 2.6%, 8.3%; I2 = 39.1%) remaining on support. Complication rates were high with haemorrhage (38.9%), renal impairment (35.2%), cerebrovascular events (29.5%), infection (17.8%), and thromboembolism (9.9%) being the most reported.
conclusionsShort-term VADs offer a feasible bridge to transplant in paediatric patients, with success rates comparable to registry data. However, high rates of serious complications and waitlist mortality persist, particularly in these younger children. These findings demonstrate the need for improved patient selection, standardized outcome reporting, and development of safer, size-appropriate devices for paediatric use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.