ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Inverted colonic diverticulum of the cecum mimicking a submucosal tumor: a case report.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInverted colonic diverticulum (ICD) is a rare endoscopic finding that often mimics a sessile polyp or submucosal tumor, increasing the risk of misdiagnosis and inappropriate intervention. Accurate identification is crucial to avoid potential complications such as perforation. This case is notable for its unusual location in the cecum and its initial misdiagnosis as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old man with a 10-year history of chronic constipation underwent routine surveillance colonoscopy, which revealed a 30–40 mm sessile lesion in the cecum near the ileocecal valve with a central depression covered by adherent debris/impacted fecal material and peripheral hyperemia; water-jet irrigation was attempted but failed to adequately clear the adherent material. Biopsies obtained from the peripheral mucosa showed benign mucosal hyperplasia, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) demonstrated focal cecal wall thickening without definite radiologic evidence of malignancy; however, malignancy could not be confidently excluded given the lesion’s size and indeterminate preoperative assessment. After multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion and shared decision-making with the patient and family, laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was performed. Gross examination showed a submucosal mass with a narrow-necked cavity connected to the bowel lumen. Histopathology confirmed inverted colonic diverticulum, with no evidence of dysplasia or malignancy. The patient recovered well without complications.
conclusionsThis case highlights the diagnostic challenges of inverted colonic diverticulum, particularly when located in the cecum. Recognition of endoscopic features and cautious interpretation of imaging are essential to prevent unnecessary or harmful procedures. Surgical resection remains a definitive option when malignancy cannot be excluded or endoscopic diagnosis is inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.