Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832329›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A bayesian network approach for systemic risk analysis in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) operations.

Lu Wang, Maoran Zhu, Na Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lu WangSchool of Civil Aviation Transportation, Shanghai Civil Aviation College, Shanghai, 200232, China.
Maoran ZhuLaboratory of High Quality Urban Development and Strategic Decision, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Na LiGlorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, 200051, China. 1239086@mail.dhu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) operations confront complex systemic risks that challenge traditional analytical methods. This paper develops a hierarchical Bayesian Network (BN) to quantitatively model these risks. Our model establishes causal pathways from foundational drivers to key performance indicators (KPIs): Safety, Mission Success, and Third-Party Risk. The baseline risk assessment reveals significant operational vulnerabilities. It identifies degraded pilot performance, evidenced by a 54% probability of ‘Poor’ Decision Making, as a primary contributor to a 56% baseline probability of an ‘Accident’. However, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis demonstrates a more critical insight: the operational environment, specifically ‘Adverse Weather’ and ‘Terrain & Obstacles’, constitutes the single most dominant risk driver across all KPIs. This finding underscores the strategic importance of rigorous pre-flight environmental assessment over in-flight reactive measures. Furthermore, the analysis reveals the necessity for differentiated mitigation strategies; Mission Success exhibits unique sensitivity to ‘Signal Interference’, a factor less critical for direct safety outcomes. This framework provides a data-driven, causal tool to support UAV operators in resource prioritization and systemic resilience enhancement within a complex operational landscape.

Identifiers

PMID41832329
PMCPMC13121793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.