Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832288›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced voiding ultrasonography and direct radionuclide cystography with physiologic bladder filling volumes in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux-a prospective study.

Hanna-Reeta Viljamaa, Tiina Laurikainen, Niklas A Pakkasjärvi, Marko Seppänen, Päivi T K Rautava, Liisi L M Ripatti

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanna-Reeta ViljamaaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Turku University Hospital and The Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-6742
Tiina LaurikainenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Turku University Hospital and The Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-9427
Niklas A PakkasjärviDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Stenbäckinkatu 9, PL 347, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. niklas.pakkasjarvi@fimnet.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-3416
Marko SeppänenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and Turku PET Centre and Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital and The Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-2445
Päivi T K RautavaDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku Clinical Research Centre, Turku University Hospital and The Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2795-1327
Liisi L M RipattiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Turku University Hospital and The Wellbeing Services County of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-8618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced voiding ultrasonography (CEVUS) and direct radionuclide cystography (DRC) at physiological bladder filling volumes in pediatric patients with suspected vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). This prospective, comparative study included 22 children with 44 renal units referred for evaluation due to recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). Bladder function was assessed as normal through a four-hour voiding observation or uroflowmetry. All patients underwent both DRC and CEVUS on the same day, using a single catheterization. The investigations were performed by blinded radiologists. The primary outcome was VUR detection in relation to bladder filling volumes. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects and clinical outcomes in relation to radiological findings. DRC detected VUR in 72.7% of patients and 50.0% of renal units, while CEVUS detected VUR in 77.3% and 52.3% respectively. Among patients with paired bladder-filling data at first VUR detection, median bladder filling volume was 37.3% (IQR 26.7-82.4) of expected bladder capacity for DRC and 66.7% (IQR 52.9-87.3) for CEVUS (Wilcoxon signed-rank p = 0.158). At patient level, paired detection rates were comparable between modalities (exact McNemar p = 1.00). At the renal unit level, intermodality agreement was moderate (Cohen's κ = 0.59; 95% CI 0.35-0.83). DRC detected VUR in 4 renal units negative on CEVUS, whereas CEVUS detected VUR in 5 renal units negative on DRC.

conclusionCEVUS was comparable to DRC in VUR detection with physiological bladder filling volumes. As a radiation-free method providing anatomical detail while minimizing bladder overfilling, CEVUS offers a valuable alternative to VUR imaging. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Voiding cystourethrography and direct radionuclide cystography are established imaging modalities for diagnosing vesicoureteral reflux, but both involve ionizing radiation. WHAT IS NEW: • Radiation-free contrast-enhanced voiding ultrasonography detects vesicoureteral reflux using physiologic bladder filling volumes with detection rates comparable to direct radionuclide cystography.

Indexed as

CystographyUrinary BladderVesico-Ureteral RefluxChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaFemaleHumansInfantMaleProspective StudiesRadionuclide ImagingUltrasonographyContrast MediaCEVUSDRCVUR

Identifiers

PMID41832288
PMCPMC12988990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.