Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832286›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting aggressiveness of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via mri using artificial intelligence: implications for surgical planning in a retrospective multicenter study.

Jiang Zhao, Haixia Wang, Rongheng Liao, Menglin Liu, Zhimeng Cui, Biao Jin, Yifan Wang, Ri Tang

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiang Zhao *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
Haixia Wang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200127, Shanghai, China.
Rongheng LiaoDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015GD Rotterdam, Rotterdam, 3015GD, Netherlands.
Menglin LiuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200127, Shanghai, China.
Zhimeng CuiDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 200040, Shanghai, China.
Biao JinDepartment of Radiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200092, Shanghai, China.
Yifan WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-2122, USA. wangyfan@umich.edu.
Ri TangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200127, Shanghai, China. raytong7@163.com.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation Promotion Project of Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Grant Number: RJTJ24-QN-035.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical planning for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is highly dependent on tumor aggressiveness. However, current decisions are predominantly based on postoperative pathology, limiting opportunities for timely and personalized treatment. A reliable, non-invasive, preoperative method for assessing tumor grade could enhance surgical outcomes and avoid unnecessary interventions. This study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict ccRCC aggressiveness and guide surgical decision-making. We retrospectively analyzed 288 preoperative MRI volumes from 332 ccRCC patients across three medical centers in China (May 2018 - March 2025). All MRI scans included axial T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Of these, 153 cases lacked lesion location and pathology annotations and were used to pre-train a foundation model. The remaining 96 cases, which included lesion location and pathology results information, were utilized for training and internal validation through cross-validation. To evaluate the model’s generalizability, an independent external validation set comprising 39 cases from two additional centers was used. A vision transformer (ViT) based foundation model and classification model were trained to automatically predict the aggressiveness of ccRCC based on preoperative MRI images. In internal validation, the AI model achieved an ROC AUC of 0.786 (95% CI: 0.682–0.877), PR AUC of 0.749 (95% CI: 0.602–0.861), with 71.4% sensitivity and 70.5% specificity in predicting high-grade ccRCC. In external validation, it reached an ROC AUC of 0.935, demonstrating improved performance compared with R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score-based nomograms (AUC: 0.691 internal, 0.796 external). The model also yielded higher PR AUCs than R.E.N.A.L. scores (0.532 internal, 0.527 external), and provided interpretable outputs aligned with surgical decision-making, supporting choices between nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy. This study demonstrates that an AI-based, MRI-driven framework can accurately predict tumor aggressiveness in ccRCC before surgery. The model holds promise for integrating into preoperative workflows, supporting precision surgery, and improving patient outcomes in renal oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceClear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)Magnetic resonance imagingPreoperative predictionTumor aggressiveness

Identifiers

PMID41832286
PMCPMC13121832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.