Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832276›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

Opening the Discussion on the Costs of Pedophilic Disorder as a Mental Health Concern.

Till Amelung, Robert J B Lehmann, Alexander F Schmidt, Armin Hoyer, Klaus M Beier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Till Amelung *Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany. till.amelung@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7930-4204
Robert J B Lehmann *Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, Hochschule für Gesundheit und Medizin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-348X
Alexander F SchmidtInstitute of Psychology, Social & Legal Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6449-2946
Armin HoyerCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Klaus M BeierCorporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Sexualwissenschaft und Sexualmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstraße 57, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1311-8748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances, pedophilic disorder remains a highly stigmatized and underexplored condition. While its classification as a mental disorder is debated, we adopt this assumption provisionally to apply a cost-of-illness (COI) framework. COI studies, though methodologically limited, offer a pragmatic tool to translate individual impairment into societal costs-thus enabling health policy discussions, identifying service gaps, and supporting early intervention. This article outlines the potential COI associated with pedophilic disorder, distinguishing between cases with offense-related behaviors (child sexual abuse and exploitation material use) and non-offending individuals. We argue that neglecting this condition economically and institutionally has led to avoidable human suffering and may increase long-term societal costs. Applying a COI perspective allows for a more empathetic and preventive public health approach-one that fosters help-seeking, reduces stigma, and ultimately helps prevent sexual victimization of children. By quantifying the hidden burden of pedophilic disorder, COI studies may support more rational, humane, and effective responses to a complex condition. They offer a dual benefit: improving care for affected individuals and reducing harm to others. In doing so, they contribute to a public health framework that neither ignores nor criminalizes, but seeks to prevent.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessMental HealthPedophiliaChildChild Abuse, SexualHumansChild sexual abuseCost of illnessDistressDSM-5-TRHebephiliaPedophilia

Identifiers

PMID41832276
PMCPMC13194264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.