Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Availability of drone mission with binary decision diagram based on uncertain data.

Elena Zaitseva, Jan Rabcan, Vitaly Levashenko, Ravil I Mukhamediev, Nicolae Brinzei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena ZaitsevaZilinska Univerzita v Ziline, Zilina, 01026, Slovakia. elena.zaitseva@fri.uniza.sk.
Jan RabcanZilinska Univerzita v Ziline, Zilina, 01026, Slovakia.
Vitaly LevashenkoZilinska Univerzita v Ziline, Zilina, 01026, Slovakia.
Ravil I MukhamedievInstitute of Automation and Information Technology, Satbayev University (KazNRTU), Almaty, 050013, Kazakhstan.
Nicolae BrinzeiUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, Nancy, F-5400, France.

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja SK-FR-24-0009Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR24992908Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV VEGA 1/0331/25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, are increasingly deployed for critical missions such as environmental monitoring, infrastructure inspection, and disaster response. Assessing the reliability of these missions is essential for operational planning, yet conventional approaches often fail when input data are incomplete or epistemically uncertain. We present a novel framework for mission availability analysis that integrates fuzzy decision tree (FDT) induction with binary decision diagram (BDD) construction. The method interprets a drone mission as a reliability system, where checkpoints act as components and mission success is modeled by a structure function. Expert evaluations expressed as confidence degrees are used to induce an FDT, which is subsequently defuzzified and transformed into a canonical BDD. This representation enables efficient computation of mission availability and sensitivity measures using established BDD algorithms. We validate the approach on a real-world case study of a forest fire monitoring mission comprising eight checkpoints and demonstrate high predictive accuracy (94%) despite incomplete training data. The proposed method provides a transparent, reproducible pipeline for translating uncertain, expert-driven data into quantitative reliability metrics, offering practical insights for mission planning under uncertainty.

Indexed as

AvailabilityBinary decision diagram (BDD)DroneFuzzy decision treeImportance measuresReliability analysisUnmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

Identifiers

PMID41832265
PMCPMC13125649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.