ArticleScientific reports2026
Availability of drone mission with binary decision diagram based on uncertain data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), or drones, are increasingly deployed for critical missions such as environmental monitoring, infrastructure inspection, and disaster response. Assessing the reliability of these missions is essential for operational planning, yet conventional approaches often fail when input data are incomplete or epistemically uncertain. We present a novel framework for mission availability analysis that integrates fuzzy decision tree (FDT) induction with binary decision diagram (BDD) construction. The method interprets a drone mission as a reliability system, where checkpoints act as components and mission success is modeled by a structure function. Expert evaluations expressed as confidence degrees are used to induce an FDT, which is subsequently defuzzified and transformed into a canonical BDD. This representation enables efficient computation of mission availability and sensitivity measures using established BDD algorithms. We validate the approach on a real-world case study of a forest fire monitoring mission comprising eight checkpoints and demonstrate high predictive accuracy (94%) despite incomplete training data. The proposed method provides a transparent, reproducible pipeline for translating uncertain, expert-driven data into quantitative reliability metrics, offering practical insights for mission planning under uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.