ArticleNature communications2026
Experimental mechanician for plate lattice metamaterial discovery.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plate lattice metamaterials offer higher strength-to-weight efficiency than traditional truss lattices. Their optimization, however, is challenging when having more parameters and multiple objectives. Here, we present an experimental mechanician (ExMech) to identify lightweight and high-strength plate lattices. ExMech integrates a robotic platform for standardized data generation and a multi-objective active learning framework for guided exploration of structure-property relationships. It optimizes plate-truss hybrid lattices in a three-variable, three-objective space. It establishes the Pareto front in 25 iterations, reducing experimental workload significantly. Pareto-optimal combinations show 15.6% and 12.0% improvements in compressive and shear yield strength respectively without compromising lightweight metrics. When prioritizing strength, it yields 158.5% and 194.8% improvements with a 13.2% increase in weight. By analyzing variable-objective relationships and failure patterns, we could identify more structurally efficient combinations. The discovered lattices are demonstrated in compression-shear tunable 3D-printed midsoles. This study illustrates a self-optimizing experimentation approach for plate lattice discovery, accelerating the discovery of new mechanical metamaterials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.