Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41832212›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Miller-Ross-functions coefficients and kernel-based CT-scan enhancement technique.

G Murugusundaramoorthy, M Nalliah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G MurugusundaramoorthySchool of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, TN, 632014, India.
M NalliahSchool of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, TN, 632014, India. nalliah.moviri@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Digital Image Processing (DIP), image enhancement using univalent functions entails mapping pixel intensity values (gray levels) using one-to-one, invertible complex functions, frequently in the frequency domain or through specialized transformations, to stretch, compress, or redistribute intensities for improved visual quality or feature detection, such as boosting contrast or lowering noise, by making sure each input pixel maps uniquely to an output pixel, going beyond simple linear/non-linear transforms. In this paper, for the new subclasses [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] in association with normalized form of Miller-Ross-type functions explored and the key coefficient inequality as given below [Formula: see text]where [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] is considered. By suitably fixing the parameters ϱ and ϖ, in [Formula: see text] and using these coefficients we discuss their application to enhance medical images in image processing. Furthermore, we introduce a novel image sharpening methodology that leverages coefficient bounds derived from the Miller-Ross function with fixing the parameters ϱ and ϖ values, integrating these bounds into pre-processing strategies for enhancing medical CT images.

Indexed as

Coefficient estimatesCT imageImage enhancement modelMiller-Ross functions

Identifiers

PMID41832212
PMCPMC13121717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.