ArticleScientific reports2026
A logic-based knowledge-driven bidirectional multi-attention GRU framework for fear level classification in humans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of fear level detection in affective computing using physiological signals has not been extensively explored. Accurately detecting fear responses facilitates real-time emotional monitoring and improves therapeutic outcomes. The logic-based learning (LBL) method integrates data-driven learning and symbolic reasoning, using logical predicates to model knowledge and develop interpretable models. By combining domain expertise with computational intelligence, the proposed framework extracts key features such as Frontal Alpha Asymmetry (FAA) from electroencephalograms (EEG) and EMO signals, and peak values from Galvanic Skin Responses (GSR) signals. These extracted features are used to determine feature-specific thresholds and logical rules. To achieve high classification performance, logic rules are defined using an Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) model. To evaluate performance metrics, data obtained from ILP are analyzed. To enhance interpretability and classification, logic rules derived from the ILP model are incorporated into deep learning models. This study uses several deep learning models for detecting fear, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Gated Recurrent Units (GRU), and Bidirectional Multi-Attention GRU (Bi-MA-GRU). This study examines the Dataset for Emotion Analysis using Physiological Signals (DEAP) and Multimodal Database for Decoding Affective Physiological Responses (DECAF) to facilitate comparisons. Using multimodal physiological data, deep learning models, and LBL techniques, the proposed technique shows that fear levels can be detected in a scalable manner through the integration of multimodal physiological data, deep learning models, and LBL techniques. A knowledge-based approach and computational intelligence enhance methodologies for understanding and managing fear-related conditions. Thus, the formulated technique achieved better performance metrics using a Bidirectional Multi-Attention GRU model that had a 96.67% accuracy with DEAP dataset and music-based data on DECAF versus 86.67% accuracy with movie-based data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.