ArticleNature communications2026
Cortical representation of multidimensional handwriting movement and implications for neuroprostheses.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-power differencing feature extracts spiking-band activities for high-performance intracortical brain-computer interfaces.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Handwriting brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have enabled high performance brain-to-text communication for paralyzed individuals. However, the detailed parameters of handwriting movement and their cortical representations remain incompletely understood. Here, we recorded intracortical neural activity from a paralyzed subject and found distinct neural representations for strokes and pen lifts with respect to two-dimensional (2D) velocity on the writing plane, indicating that 2D kinematics alone cannot fully account for the observed neural variance. To address this, we acquired multidimensional handwriting data from healthy subjects, including 3D velocity, grip force, writing pressure, and multi-channel electromyographic (EMG) signals. Incorporating these additional dimensions beyond 2D velocity significantly improved the interpretability of neural signals for both strokes and pen lifts. We further leveraged these additional dimensions to enhance handwriting decoding performance. Together, our findings indicate the motor cortex encodes handwriting as multidimensional movement and highlight the importance of multidimensional features for improving the performance of handwriting BCIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.